We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Tell me about a time when you disagreed with a final decision but still committed wholly to its execution.
How did you navigate this situation and ensure a successful outcome? Did you learn anything new that changed your mind about your initial position?
Example Answers
-
Certainly. As a product manager, it's not uncommon to encounter situations where you don't fully agree with a final decision, but it's important to remain committed to executing it to the best of your abilities.
One example that comes to mind is when I was working on a major product overhaul for a client in the healthcare industry. Our team had presented several different design concepts, and while my preferred option was chosen, the final decision ended up being a hybrid of two designs. Although I wasn't entirely convinced that this was the best approach, I recognized that it was a decision made by the client, with the input of multiple stakeholders, and ultimately aimed at improving the user experience.
To navigate this situation, I took a step back to understand the reasoning behind the decision and ensure that I fully understood the client's perspective. I worked closely with the design team to ensure that we were able to execute on this hybrid design while still meeting the project goals and requirements. I also made sure to communicate the reasoning behind the decision to the entire team, so that everyone was aligned on the path forward.
During the execution phase, I continued to monitor the progress closely and made adjustments where necessary. As we started to receive user feedback, I began to see the benefits of the hybrid design - it actually achieved some of our original goals even better than my preferred option would have. This experience taught me to be more open-minded in my thinking and recognize that a variety of perspectives can lead to successful outcomes.
Ultimately, the project was a great success - we met all of the client's requirements and received excellent feedback from users. In reflecting on this experience, I realized that although it can be difficult to commit to a decision you don't entirely agree with, it's important to remain focused on the goals and objectives of the project and work collaboratively to achieve the best possible outcome.
-
Sure, I am happy to answer that question. As a product manager, disagreements are an inevitable part of the job. Last year, I was working on a project that involved redesigning the cart and checkout page of an e-commerce website. My team and I had conducted extensive research and gathered data on the current user flow, and we had proposed a new design that we believed would improve the user experience and drive higher conversions.
However, when we presented the new design to the stakeholders, they had a different vision for the checkout page. They believed that the new design lacked certain features that they deemed essential for the company's branding and user experience. I disagreed with their vision and firmly believed that our proposed design was the best way forward.
Despite our disagreement, I realized that it was important to align with the stakeholders' vision as they held the final decision-making authority. At the same time, I wanted to ensure that the new checkout page would be as user-friendly and effective as possible. So, I took a step back and listened to the stakeholders' feedback and concerns about the design.
From this feedback, I gained a new perspective. I realized that some of their concerns were valid, and the features they wanted to include were necessary. I also recognized that our proposed design was missing a few elements that could have compromised the user experience.
Therefore, I worked closely with my team to incorporate the essential features recommended by the stakeholders while still ensuring that the user experience and conversion rates were not compromised. We used A/B testing to evaluate the final design, and the results showed an increase in conversions and a positive response from users.
Ultimately, by fully committing to the execution of the stakeholders' vision, I was able to learn new things that changed my perspective, and by collaborating with my team, we delivered a successful outcome while maintaining a high-quality user experience.
-
Absolutely, let me share an experience from my previous work as a product manager for a social networking application. Our team was discussing whether to make certain changes to our app's navigation menu, and I had proposed a different approach. However, the final decision was made to move forward with the navigation changes I disagreed with.
My initial reaction was to push back, to express my opinion once again, and try to convince my colleagues that my idea could lead to better user engagement. But in the end, as a team player and a responsible product manager, I understood that sometimes consensus is not always possible, and it's important to respect the final verdict.
With that in mind, I shifted my priorities to ensure that the new navigation would be implemented in the best possible way. I took it upon myself to work with the design and development teams, providing them with the necessary guidance and resources they needed to execute in a seamless manner.
Although I wasn't initially convinced that the new navigation was the best option, I was willing to give it my best effort and support it 100%. And in the end, after observing the positive feedback from our user base, I learned that I was wrong, and the final decision was indeed the correct one.
What I learned from this experience is that as a product manager, it's important to always remain open to new ideas and be willing to change your mind if presented with compelling evidence. Additionally, demonstrating a willingness to support and execute on team decisions, even if they are not what you initially had in mind, can lead to better outcomes and improved overall team morale.
-
Sure, I'm happy to share an experience I had in the past that relates to this question.
At my previous company, I was managing the development of a new consumer electronics product that had to meet a tight deadline for a major retail launch. During the development process, there was a disagreement between the hardware and software teams about a critical feature that would have a major impact on the product's overall design.
The hardware team was pushing for a complex and costly solution that would have significantly delayed the product's release, while the software team argued for a simpler and less expensive solution that could be implemented quickly. As the product manager, I had to weigh the pros and cons of both options and make a recommendation to our senior management team.
After careful analysis and discussions with both teams, I recommended that we go with the simpler and less expensive solution proposed by the software team. However, our senior management team ultimately decided to go with the more complex and costly solution proposed by the hardware team.
Despite my initial disagreement, I knew that as a product manager, it was important to support the final decision and ensure the successful execution of the project. I worked closely with the hardware and software teams to ensure that we could still meet the tight deadline, even with the complexities of the more expensive solution.
Throughout the execution of the project, I kept an open mind and remained diligent in monitoring progress, risks, and issues. While the more expensive solution did cause delays and added complexities, we were still able to deliver the product to market on time and hit our sales targets.
Looking back, I learned a valuable lesson about the importance of staying flexible and open to new perspectives, even when it goes against our initial beliefs. And in this particular case, it ended up being a successful outcome that exceeded our expectations.
-
Thank you for the question. I'd be happy to share a situation that fits this scenario.
At my previous company, we were discussing a major pricing overhaul for one of our key SaaS products. Our proposal was to shift from a flat monthly fee to a pricing model based on usage tiers, which we believed would be more aligned with the value that customers were receiving from our product.
However, during the final stakeholder meeting, one of the senior executives pushed back strongly on this proposal, suggesting that it could hurt our share of the market and negatively affect customer retention.
While I didn't fully agree with the concerns being raised, I recognised that the decision was ultimately not mine to make alone. Thus, I focused on listening to all the executives to understand their perspectives and interests - including the reservations of the developer team who would be involved in such major changes.
To ensure a successful outcome, my team and I collaborated on modifying our proposal to mitigate most of these concerns raised by the stakeholders. The new pricing model would be first piloted with a small segment of customers before rolling out to all customers. We outlined a thorough communication plan to explain the changes to our users, and we suspended the implementation of any pricing changes until we had ensured that any critical bugs or issues were resolved.
While the changes we had made made sense, and our testing showed that the changes would benefit the product in the long run - it took a bit longer than we had initially anticipated. Additionally, seeing how the stakeholders' concerns played out in the pilot phase helped me to see the change more from their perspective and appreciate the risks that were involved.
In the end, however, the changes were launched, and we ended up seeing a spike in user engagement, as our users became more aware of the value that our platform provided. The experience taught me that taking a more holistic approach, where we care about stakeholder input, is crucial to ensuring that decisions, such as pricing models, are still successful. In addition, seeing how the competing interests played out made me more cautious in any future proposals that may have a similarly significant impact.
-
Certainly, I would be happy to share an experience I had as a product manager where I disagreed with a final decision but still committed wholly to its execution.
In a previous role, I was responsible for developing a cybersecurity solution for a group of clients in the financial services industry. During the development process, there was a decision made by senior management to leave out a specific feature that I felt was crucial to the success of the product. I knew that this feature would greatly benefit our clients, both in terms of security and ease of use, and I felt strongly that it should be included.
However, after much discussion and back-and-forth, the decision was made to move forward without the feature. Although I disagreed with the decision, as a product manager, I knew it was my responsibility to ensure the success of the product, even if it meant putting my personal beliefs aside.
To navigate this situation, I worked closely with the development team to ensure that the final product was as robust and effective as possible, given the limitations. I focused on highlighting the features that were included, and how they benefited our clients. I also made sure to communicate with clients directly, to make sure they understood the limitations of the product, while emphasizing the importance and strengths of the features that were included.
Through this process, I learned new things about cybersecurity trends and client needs that challenged my initial opinion about putting the additional feature in the product. Eventually, the product launched successfully and received positive feedback from our clients. But, more importantly, the experience taught me the importance of focusing on the overall success of the project, and not getting bogged down in individual features or details.
In summary, while I disagreed with the final decision to leave out a key feature of the cybersecurity product, I remained committed to ensuring its success by focusing on the strengths of the features that were included and effectively communicating the product's benefits to our clients. Through this experience, I also gained new perspectives and learned valuable lessons that have informed my approach to product management going forward.